Legality of eSignatures in South Africa
Background
In document authentication, electronic signatures are revolutionizing the status quo, offering streamlined and eco-friendly solutions that are gaining traction across South Africa and the world at large. These electronic alternatives to traditional signing processes reduce reliance on paper and expedite transaction execution.
Understanding the key elements in adopting electronic signatures within South Africa is imperative. One must ensure that any chosen electronic signature service complies with the local legal framework, particularly the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act (ECTA) of 2002. This compliance is necessary for electronic signatures to be recognized as legally equivalent to handwritten signatures within the country’s jurisdiction. Although electronic signatures are widely accepted, it is worth noting that certain documents may still require a holographic signature, and legal advice is recommended due to potential variations in regional regulations.
The security of electronic signature solutions cannot be overstated. Services should incorporate robust security measures, such as data encryption, identity verification, and detailed audit trails, to prevent unauthorized access and affirm the integrity of signed documents. BoldSign is an example of a service that provides these essential security assurances, ensuring adherence to both legal and safety standards.
With the increasing acceptance and clear benefits of electronic signatures, it is vital for businesses in South Africa to focus on legal compliance, prioritize security, and opt for an intuitive platform. Doing so will seamlessly integrate eSignatures into their business operations, enhancing efficiency and safeguarding transactions.
Overview of eSignature regulations
The operation of electronic signatures is regulated by the Electronic Communications and Transactions Act 2002. The Act gives eSignature legal validity equal to that granted to the wet ink signature before its enactment.
Section 121 of the Act spells out that a requirement under any law that a document must be in writing is met if the said document is in the form of a data message and accessible for subsequent reference.
The Act categorizes these kinds of signatures into two:
- Standard Electronic Signature
- Advanced Electronic Signature
A standard eSignature is any electronic data linked to, incorporated in, or logically associated with other electronic data intended by the user to serve as a signature.2
An advanced electronic signature is an eSignature resulting from a process by which the Accreditation Authority has accredited.3
Transactions given distinct considerations
According to the regulations, when there is no specific requirement regarding the type of signature to be employed, either an advanced electronic signature or a traditional handwritten (wet ink) signature is considered legitimately acceptable [Section 13].
Section 18 of the Act spells out transactions that can only be completed using an advanced electronic signature if a wet-ink signature is not used. These are:
- Notarizations/statements under oath
- Acknowledgements
- Certification of documents
Additionally, the copyright assignment under the Copyright Act must be either signed with a wet-ink signature or an advanced electronic signature.
Articles 27 and 28 of the ECTA in proving the freedom of will in the completion of documents, provide the authority for public bodies to receive electronic records, licenses, permits, and payments. Nonetheless, such acceptance must be explicitly authorized by relevant legislation, and the public body holds the right to determine the particular electronic signature variety needed, as well as the method and format in which the electronic signature should be affixed to or integrated within the electronic message.
Reliability of the eSignature
A reliable and valid electronic signature under the Electronic Communication Act [S.38] must be4:
- Uniquely linked to the signer
- Capable of identifying the signers
- Developed using means that the signatory can maintain their control
- Capable of identifying any alterations
- Based on the face-to-face identification of the user
Uniquely linked to a signer
An electronic signature must be uniquely connected to the person using it. The signature must be uniquely made with methods only the signer can access, like a private key and confidential information, to verify their identity.
Use and incorporation remain in their sole control
The person using the secure electronic signature must have sole control over the means of creating the signature. Typically, this requires managing a key pair or two-factor authentication, with the signer exclusively holding the private key to prevent signature forgery.
Identify the person using the technological process
The process used to create the signature must be capable of identifying the person signing. This may include using a biometric signature, personal identification number (PIN), email address, or company registration number.
Track down any alterations made after signing
Preserving the authenticity of the signed document is essential. Modifications made to the document post-signature should be identifiable. This is commonly accomplished through an audit trail. Audit trails record the signer’s IP address, timestamps of key signing events, and location, providing proof of identity, timing, and place of signature.
Summary Analysis
Under the Electronic Communication and Transactions Act 2002
Type of eSignatures
Reliability standards (Section 38)
Unique features (Section 37)
Special Consideration on use (S. 22(3) of the Copyright Act & S.18 E.C.T.A.)
Standard Electronic Signatures
- Uniquely linked to the user
- Capable of identifying the user
- Incorporation and use are under the sole control of the signers/users
- Able to detect post-signing changes
- Able to show approval for completion in electronic form
N/A
N/A
Advanced Electronic Signatures
- Uniquely linked to the user
- Capable of identifying the user
- Incorporation and use are under the sole control of the signers/users
- Able to detect post-signing changes
- Able to show approval for completion in electronic form
- Accredited by the accreditation authority
- Based on a qualified certificate
- Notarizations/statements under oath
- Acknowledgements
- Certification of documents
- Assignment of copyright
| Type of eSignatures | Reliability standards (Section 38) | Unique features (Section 37) | Special Consideration on use (S. 22(3) of the Copyright Act & S.18 E.C.T.A.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Electronic Signatures |
| N/A | N/A |
| Advanced Electronic Signatures |
|
|
Exempted transactions
The Electronic Communication and Transactions Act of South Africa does not specifically outline which types of transactions are excluded from finalization when using an electronic signatures. The legislation confers comprehensive legal validity to advanced electronic signatures in transactions, particularly in cases where no prescribed method of signing is indicated.
However, caution should be taken when dealing with
- Wills
- Bills of exchange
- Powers of attorney
- Long-term leases (greater than 20 years)
- Creation/transfer of rights in immovable property
- Intellectual property transfers
Unique considerations from case laws:
In Aarifah Security Services CC v Jakoita Properties (Pty) Ltd and others 2020 4 All SA 730 (G.J.)5the Judicial body observed, though specifically in relation to land transfer scenarios outside the scope of ECTA, that under section 13(1) of the ECTA, a standard electronic signature (such as one used in an email) might be adequate when the parties involved have mutually agreed on the need for a signature. However, this form of signature might not meet the necessary standards if the requirement for a signature is established by law.
The case of Spring Forest Trading 599 CC v Wilberry (Pty) Ltd t/a Ecowash & another.6 It is notable for being the first to explicitly uphold the legal legitimacy of utilizing an email and a standard electronic signature to modify or terminate a contract that includes a clause prohibiting such changes. In this case, the Supreme Court of Appeal declared that an agreement could be legally amended through emails exchanged between the parties, each bearing a simple signature. There is no necessity for an advanced electronic signature in this context.
In the case of Borcherds and Another v Duxbury and Others7, a sale agreement for land in the Eastern Cape was signed using the Docusign app. The signatory used digital images of his handwritten signature, which raised questions about the legal requirement for “wet ink” signatures on land sale contracts in South Africa. The court found that the electronic signature met the requirements of the Alienation of Land Act (ALA), even though the ALA . does not define “sign” or “signed,” and historically, various forms of marks have been accepted as signatures. However, caution is advised regarding this judgment as it comes from a single judge in the Eastern Cape and is not binding elsewhere. Until higher courts confirm this ruling or laws are amended, it is safer to use traditional wet ink signatures for land sale agreements.
How does BoldSign Help?
The following elements available within BoldSign ensure compliance with the South African eSignature laws:
- Secure and unique signing link: A secure and unique link to sign a document is sent directly to the signer’s email address. This helps ensure that the document is only accessed by the intended signer and cannot be tampered with.
- Password protection: Senders can specify a password that needs to be entered before viewing and signing a document. This adds an additional layer of security to the signing process.
- Audit trail: The IP address of the signer along with timestamps for all major events in the signing process are recorded in an audit trail. This provides a record of who signed the document, when they signed it, and from where they signed it.
- Digital signature: The final document is digitally signed with an AATLcompliant certificate. This ensures that the document cannot be tampered with without invalidating the signature.
- Consent: Signers are asked to confirm their intent to sign electronically and are also informed that they can opt out. This helps ensure that the signer is aware of the implications of signing electronically and that they have given their consent to do so.
- Custom terms: Getting your signers to agree to a custom set of terms. This can be useful to ensure additional security or that the signer understands the terms of the document.
Disclaimer: Information on this page is intended to help businesses understand the legal framework of electronic signatures for this country.
However, Syncfusion’s officers, directors, stockholders, affiliates, attorneys, accountants, employees, or agents cannot provide legal advice. You should consult your personal attorney regarding your specific legal questions. Laws and regulations change frequently, and this information may not be current or accurate. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Syncfusion provides this material on an “as-is” basis. Syncfusion disclaims and makes no representation or warranty of any kind with respect to this material, express, implied, or statutory, including representations, guarantees, or warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or accuracy.
Syncfusion makes no warranties of any kind, including but not limited to the information or the product, whether express, implied, statutory, or otherwise. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Syncfusion disclaims all conditions, representations, and warranties, whether express, implied, or statutory, with respect to this information without limitation any implied warranty of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy, or currentness of this information.
Syncfusion nor their officers, directors, stockholders, employees, affiliates, attorneys, accountants, or agents shall be liable for indemnification, nor does this create an express or implied, contractual or statutory, equitable or otherwise, under this Agreement. The officers, directors, stockholders, affiliates, attorneys, accountants, or agents will not have any liability in any form.
1 Electronic Communication and Transactions Act 2002
2 Ibid Section 1
3 Ibid Section 37
4 Electronic Communication and Transactions Act 2002 Section 38
5 Aarifah Security Services CC v Jakoita Properties (Pty) Ltd and Others (12994/18) [2020] ZAGPJHC 222; [2020] 4 All SA 730 (G.J.); 2021 (5) SA 207 (G.J.) (21 September 2020) [https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2020/222.html]
6 Spring Forest Trading 599 CC v Wilberry (Pty) Ltd t/a Ecowash and Another (725/13) [2014] ZASCA 178; 2015 (2) SA 118 (S.C.A.) (21 November 2014) [https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2014/178.html]
7 Borcherds and Another v Duxbury and Others (1522/2020) [2020] ZAECPEHC 37; 2021 (1) SA 410 (ECP) (22 September 2020) – [https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAECPEHC/2020/37.html] – See also FirstRand Bank Limited t/a Wesbank v Govendor (2021/ 25131) [2023] ZAGPJHC 610 (1 June 2023) [https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2023/610.html]
Enterprise-Ready E-Signatures
Built to scale with your business
Close deals faster, cut costs, and stay compliant. From startups to global enterprises, thousands trust BoldSign to simplify document signing.
Years in business
Customers
Countries
Built-in features
Testimonials
Why our customers love us
The true measure of our impact lies in the stories shared by our valued partners.
Google Integration, 25 free sends, dashboard, Signature font options, App is very responsive / fast, Emails between sender and signer are good, Audit trail is very helpful, No account needed for signer is great, Mobile experience is good for signer.
Jeremy Kadlec
Edgewood Solutions
Switch to BoldSign already! It's intuitive to use and affordable for small businesses. I never have to worry about the status of a document because with BoldSign I know. Plus, they let you program the frequency of reminders signatories receive. I'm so glad to have found it!
Sarah Dillard
Kaleidoscope
We’re using BoldSign successfully in our b2b SaaS platform - as it’s embedded to allow seasonal farm workers and their agribusiness employers to e-sign their employment onboarding documents for the first time. It’s part of the total solution saving the workers and HR managers 50% more time compared to their traditional pen/paper manual process.
Scott Prince
Croft
Sign up for your free trial today!
30-day free trial- No credit card required
- 30-day free trial
- No credit card required
